Omc Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Virginia v. Black involved two incidents of cross burning, one by Barry Black and the other by Richard Elliott and Jonathan O'Mara. Which of the following best describes the two incidents? - ANSWER-Black burned a cross at a Ku Klux Klan rally, and Elliott and O'Mara burned a cross in a neighbor's yard. The plurality opinion in Virginia v. Black, written by Justice O'Connor, found the Virginia statute on cross burning unconstitutional because - ANSWER-The prima facie provision eliminates t...

JOMC101 Chapter 14 Question and answers rated A+ 2023/2024 true - correct answer The set of criteria for deciding what is newsworthy has evolved over time. A) True B) False true - correct answer An inverted-pyramid lead, carefully attributed sources, and limited use of adverbs

JOMC 486 – Midterm Exam Verified 100% Correct!! Paul Robert Cohen In 1986 - Arrested for wearing a jacket that said "F*** the Draft" Violations of the first amendment -Obscenity -Hate Speech -Fighting Words -Incitement of unlawful activity Issue: no violence Cohen had the right to wear the jacket bc communicating emotional feeling // violation to his freedom of speech Words of the First Amendment applying to media Law, abridging, freedom, speech, and press Government power to p...

JOMC 486 Online Quizzes with Verifies SolutionsJOMC 486 Online Quizzes with Verifies Solutions

Comcast-General Safety Test 2024 Actual Questions and Answers with complete solution

JOMC 486 Quizzes With 100% Correct Ans…

JOMC 486 MASS MEDIA LAW BENDER LATEST UPDATE 2024.JOMC 486 MASS MEDIA LAW BENDER LATEST UPDATE 2024.JOMC 486 MASS MEDIA LAW BENDER LATEST UPDATE 2024.

Nebraska v. Drahota (2010) - ANSWER-- Darren J. Drahota was convicted of a breach of the peace based on two emails he sent to William Avery, his former political science professor and a candidate for the State Legislature. These emails were full of provocative and insulting rhetoric. Drahota suggested that Avery was a traitor and that he sympathized with Al Qaeda, a terrorist organization. - The court said Drahota's emails were not fighting words because the context of Drahota's speech was a...

JOMC 486 Test 1 Solved 100% Correct!! Brandenburg was convicted under the Ohio Criminal Syndicalism law which prohibited (brandenburg vs. ohio) advocacy of violence to bring about industrial or political reform. Brandenburg was filmed at a rally of (brandenburg vs. ohio) the Ku Klux Klan. In the 1927 Whitney v. California decision, the U.S. Supreme Court had said a criminal syndicalism statute similar to Ohio's was (brandenburg vs. ohio) constitutional. According to the Supreme Court, ...

Levels of Scrutiny - ANSWER-1. Strict scrutiny: meaning the government must show the law or regulation fritters a compelling governmental interest and is narrowly tailored for achieving that interest. 2. Intermediate scrutiny: meaning the government must show the law or regulation serves a substantial governmental interest and directly advances that interest. 3. The Rational-Basis test: meaning the law or regulation serves a legitimate governmental purpose and is reasonably related to that pur...